Difference between revisions of "Working with CREAM CE servers and VOs"
(50 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | The CREAM CE servers allow valid users to submit jobs so this means authorization plays a role in the CREAM CE function. | + | The CREAM CE servers allow valid users to submit jobs so this means authorization plays a role in the CREAM CE function. The servers for Nikhef are managed by Quattor from stal.nikhef.nl and are running UMD-4. |
− | This documentation page | + | This documentation page describes how to enable a new assurance profile on the CREAM CE servers and allow a specific VO to run jobs. In this case we enabled Identifier-Only Trust Assurance (IOTA) or Combined Assurance/Adequacy Model (CAM). ([https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/EGI_IGTF_Release#Combined_Assurance.2FAdequacy_Model More information can be found in the IGTF documentation on Combined Assurance].) |
== Adding plugins in Quattor == | == Adding plugins in Quattor == | ||
− | Enabling a differentiated assurance profile for access to the Grid cluster requires | + | Enabling a differentiated assurance profile for access to the Grid cluster requires two additional software package installations: lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap.x86_64 and ca-policy-egi-cam.noarch. |
− | + | These two software packages are included in the following templates in quattor. | |
+ | |||
+ | 1. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/ce/rpms.tpl add the LCMAPS-plugins-vo-ca-ap package | ||
'/software/packages/{lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap}' = nlist(); | '/software/packages/{lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap}' = nlist(); | ||
− | + | 2. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/ce/service.tpl add the ca-policy-egi-cam package next to the general CA.tpl | |
+ | |||
+ | # manually adding the cam policy for the IOTA CA's instead of in the general CA since all nodes shouldn't be using the IOTA CAs | ||
+ | include { 'common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam' }; | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/common/security/ create a new template file called ca-policy-egi-cam package | ||
template common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam; | template common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam; | ||
"/software/packages/{ca-policy-egi-cam}" = nlist(); | "/software/packages/{ca-policy-egi-cam}" = nlist(); | ||
− | Since LCMAPS is managed by [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/YAIM YAIM] (which | + | 4. In /srv/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/wn-torque4/service.tpl the worker nodes need to load the egi-cam package. (Note! The /srv/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/wn/ will not push any packages to the worker nodes. It is no longer an active directory.) So these lines were added to the service.tpl: |
+ | |||
+ | # manually adding the cam policy for the IOTA CA's instead of in the general CA since all nodes should not be using the IOTA CAs | ||
+ | include { 'common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam' }; | ||
+ | |||
+ | If needed, add the VOs to the CREAM CE node ITB profile under clusters/itb/profiles/ in Quattor. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For production servers, /site/vo/cream-selected.tpl manages the list of allowed VOs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Creating new variables == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since LCMAPS is managed by [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/YAIM YAIM] (which runs independent of the Quattor deployment), the variable VO_CA_AP_FILE needs to be defined in a few places. (The changes to these files build the site-info.pre). | ||
+ | |||
+ | VO_CA_AP_FILE="/etc/grid-security/vo-ca-ap-file" | ||
+ | |||
+ | This definition is added to: | ||
* /quattor/conf/cfg/grid/yaim/mapping_functions.tpl (to map the variable from Quattor to YAIM) | * /quattor/conf/cfg/grid/yaim/mapping_functions.tpl (to map the variable from Quattor to YAIM) | ||
− | * /quattor/conf/cfg/sites/ndpf/site/config/yaim.tpl (template that YAIM takes as input for the site-info.pre file which is used to create the lcmaps.db on the CREAM CE server) | + | * /quattor/conf/cfg/sites/ndpf/site/config/yaim.tpl (template that YAIM takes as input for the site-info.pre file which is used to create the lcmaps.db on the CREAM CE server.) |
== Creating vo-ca-ap-file == | == Creating vo-ca-ap-file == | ||
− | + | The vo-ca-ap-file template in quattor was created under grid/common/security to create a single spot for the security and policy implementations. | |
− | More detailed information about the LCMAPS plugin can be found | + | More detailed information about the LCMAPS plugin and creating this file can be found on the [https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap LCMAPS Plugin (vo-ca-ap) wiki page]. |
unique template common/security/vo-ca-ap-file; | unique template common/security/vo-ca-ap-file; | ||
Line 88: | Line 110: | ||
== Rebuilding Nikhef RPMs == | == Rebuilding Nikhef RPMs == | ||
− | The variable(s) (VO_CA_AP_FILE) | + | The variable(s) (VO_CA_AP_FILE) needs to be defined/updated in the nikhef-yaim-cream-ce and nikhef-yaim-core rpms. |
− | *in trunk/nikhef-yaim-core/functions/local/config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4 (this file creates the lcmaps.db file on the server which | + | These rpms are built locally from an svn repository (svn+ssh://svn@ndpfsvn.nikhef.nl/repos/ndpf/nl.nikhef.ndpf.yaim/trunk). The two RPMs need an additional function (config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4 and config_cream_glexec) and variable (vo_ca_ap). |
+ | |||
+ | *in trunk/nikhef-yaim-core/functions/local/config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4 (this file creates the lcmaps.db file on the server which now includes the vo-ca-ap policy) | ||
vo_ca_ap = "lcmaps_vo_ca_ap.mod" | vo_ca_ap = "lcmaps_vo_ca_ap.mod" | ||
" -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" | " -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" | ||
" -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" | " -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" | ||
+ | |||
# policies | # policies | ||
withvoms: | withvoms: | ||
Line 101: | Line 126: | ||
vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount | vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount | ||
vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf | ||
+ | |||
standard: | standard: | ||
vo_ca_ap -> localaccount | vo_ca_ap -> localaccount | ||
Line 111: | Line 137: | ||
" -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" | " -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" | ||
" -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" | " -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" | ||
+ | |||
# policies | # policies | ||
withvoms: | withvoms: | ||
Line 118: | Line 145: | ||
vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount | vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount | ||
vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf | ||
+ | |||
standard: | standard: | ||
proxycheck -> vo_ca_ap | proxycheck -> vo_ca_ap | ||
Line 124: | Line 152: | ||
poolaccount -> posix_enf | poolaccount -> posix_enf | ||
− | If the files do not exist to amend, they are available from the EGI repository: [http://repository.egi.eu/sw/production/umd/4/centos7/x86_64/updates/ http://repository.egi.eu/sw/production/umd/4/centos7/x86_64/updates/] | + | If the files (or functions) do not exist to amend in the existing RPMs, they are available from the EGI repository: [http://repository.egi.eu/sw/production/umd/4/centos7/x86_64/updates/ http://repository.egi.eu/sw/production/umd/4/centos7/x86_64/updates/]--then search for the latest yaim-core release. |
− | Next, the RPMs are built using the makefile available in the svn repository. The standard directory structure for building an RPM | + | Next, the RPMs are built using the makefile available in the svn repository. The standard directory structure for building an RPM may need to be created: BUILD, BUILDROOT, RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS, and SRPMS directories. |
The new noarchs are then copied to stal.nikhef.nl under /project/quattor/www/html/mirror/nikhef/tools/el6/... | The new noarchs are then copied to stal.nikhef.nl under /project/quattor/www/html/mirror/nikhef/tools/el6/... | ||
Line 136: | Line 164: | ||
(The deploy-to-mirrors command will push the updated snapshot to stalkaars-01 and stalkaars-03.) | (The deploy-to-mirrors command will push the updated snapshot to stalkaars-01 and stalkaars-03.) | ||
− | + | The nikhef-tools snapshot is edited on stal: /srv/quattor/etc/repository-snapshots/nikhef-tools-el6.conf | |
− | + | and conf/cfg/clusters/itb/repository/config.tpl | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | For the prd implementation, /project/quattor/conf/cfg/sites/ndpf/site/repository/default-snapshots.tpl updates with the snapshot date. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Pushing the changes == | == Pushing the changes == | ||
Line 173: | Line 177: | ||
pushxprof -f itb | pushxprof -f itb | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once this is done, it is required to rerun yaim manually on each CREAM CE server. The software packages that are pushed from quattor are triggered on the updated servers, however, the CREAM CE servers do not know that YAIM needs to be run to update the configuration. Therefore running: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ncm-ncd --co yaim | ||
+ | |||
+ | should allow the updated policies to be implemented. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Log in on a worker node to check if the software packages were added will help later in the debugging process. | ||
== Checking if it worked... == | == Checking if it worked... == | ||
− | Before pushing the changes into production (prd), it is advised to push the changes to the testbed ( | + | Before pushing the changes into production (prd), it is advised to push the changes to the testbed (itb) and run a simple test job with the help of a user. |
− | Log onto a test CREAM CE server (i.e., tbn15.nikhef.nl) | + | Log onto a test CREAM CE server (i.e., tbn15.nikhef.nl): |
* check the lcmaps-plugin has been installed | * check the lcmaps-plugin has been installed | ||
Line 184: | Line 196: | ||
* /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps.db and /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps-glexec.db have the vo-ca-ap policies updated in the files. | * /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps.db and /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps-glexec.db have the vo-ca-ap policies updated in the files. | ||
* and/or check the config files are correct under /opt/glite/yaim/functions/config_cream_glexec and config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4. | * and/or check the config files are correct under /opt/glite/yaim/functions/config_cream_glexec and config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4. | ||
− | * and | + | * and this file exists: /etc/grid-security/vo-ca-ap-file |
* check /usr/share/doc/ca-policy-egi/ca-policy-egi-cam.vo-ca-ap | * check /usr/share/doc/ca-policy-egi/ca-policy-egi-cam.vo-ca-ap | ||
== Troubleshooting hints == | == Troubleshooting hints == | ||
− | * | + | * ncm-ncd --co yaim will rerun YAIM manually on the server. |
* /opt/glite/yaim/bin/yaim -c -s /etc/siteinfo/lcg-quattor-site-info.def -n creamCE -n TORQUE_utils | * /opt/glite/yaim/bin/yaim -c -s /etc/siteinfo/lcg-quattor-site-info.def -n creamCE -n TORQUE_utils | ||
* useful logs to check the quattor deployment: /var/log/ncm/ncd.log (more verbose information is available from /var/log/ncm-cdispd.log) | * useful logs to check the quattor deployment: /var/log/ncm/ncd.log (more verbose information is available from /var/log/ncm-cdispd.log) | ||
+ | |||
+ | If things are still failing, it is helpful to add a VO that you can test from in the VO-CA-AP file on a CREAM CE and/or UI server, then figure out which worker node the job is being delegated to. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This was the error the user received: | ||
+ | ****** JobID=https://stremsel.nikhef.nl:8443/CREAM910312615 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Status = [DONE-FAILED] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ExitCode = [N/A] | ||
+ | |||
+ | FailureReason = [Cannot move ISB (retry_copy ${globus_transfer_cmd} | ||
+ | gsiftp://stremsel.nikhef.nl/var/cream_sandbox | ||
+ | /mine/CN_USERNAME_HBIW9YENQ_9vUbLu_O_surfsara_nl_DC_rcauth_clients_DC_rcauth_DC_eu_VONAME_NULL_Capability_NULL_mine000 | ||
+ | /91/CREAM910312615/ISB/test.sh file:///tmp/jobdir/42164683.korf.nikhef.nl/CREAM910312615/test.sh): | ||
+ | |||
+ | error: globus_ftp_client: the server responded with an error500 500-Command failed. : callback failed.500-an end-of-file was reached500-globus_xio: The GSI | ||
+ | XIO driver failed to establish a secure connection. The failure occured during a handshake read.500-globus_xio: An end of file occurred500 End.; reason=1; | ||
+ | Cannot move ISB (retry_copy ${globus_transfer_cmd} | ||
+ | |||
+ | gsiftp://stremsel.nikhef.nl/var/cream_sandbox | ||
+ | /mine/CN_USERNAME_HBIW9YENQ_9vUbLu_O_surfsara_nl_DC_rcauth_clients_DC_rcauth_DC_eu_VONAME_NULL_Capability_NULL_mine000 | ||
+ | /91/CREAM910312615/ISB/test.sh file:///tmp/jobdir/42164683.korf.nikhef.nl/CREAM910312615/test.sh): error: globus_ftp_client: the server responded with an error | ||
+ | 500 500-Command failed. : callback failed. 500-an end-of-file was reached 500-globus_xio: The GSI XIO driver failed to establish a secure connection. The | ||
+ | failure occured during a handshake read. 500-globus_xio: An end of file occurred 500 End.] | ||
+ | |||
+ | The cause for this error seemed to be the worker nodes not having the egi-cam packages installed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It may require adding ca_RCauth-Pilot-ICA-G1.noarch temporarily to a UI server where you can submit the jobs. | ||
== Useful references == | == Useful references == | ||
− | |||
# [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/EGI_IGTF_Release#Combined_Assurance.2FAdequacy_Model IGTF documentation on Combined Assurance] | # [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/EGI_IGTF_Release#Combined_Assurance.2FAdequacy_Model IGTF documentation on Combined Assurance] | ||
# [https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap LCMAPS Plugin (vo-ca-ap)] | # [https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap LCMAPS Plugin (vo-ca-ap)] |
Latest revision as of 13:22, 1 May 2019
Introduction
The Computing Resource Execution And Management (CREAM) Service is used for job management across nodes in a Computing Element (CE). Nikhef has 4 production and 2 test CREAM CE servers that run in the Nikhef Grid Cluster. (The most authoritative list of the current CREAM CE servers can be found at: NDPF:System_Functions.)
Production servers |
---|
klomp.nikhef.nl |
juk.nikhef.nl |
gazon.nikhef.nl |
stremsel.nikhef.nl |
Testbed (ITB) servers |
---|
tbn15.nikhef.nl |
tbn21.nikhef.nl |
The CREAM CE servers allow valid users to submit jobs so this means authorization plays a role in the CREAM CE function. The servers for Nikhef are managed by Quattor from stal.nikhef.nl and are running UMD-4.
This documentation page describes how to enable a new assurance profile on the CREAM CE servers and allow a specific VO to run jobs. In this case we enabled Identifier-Only Trust Assurance (IOTA) or Combined Assurance/Adequacy Model (CAM). (More information can be found in the IGTF documentation on Combined Assurance.)
Adding plugins in Quattor
Enabling a differentiated assurance profile for access to the Grid cluster requires two additional software package installations: lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap.x86_64 and ca-policy-egi-cam.noarch.
These two software packages are included in the following templates in quattor.
1. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/ce/rpms.tpl add the LCMAPS-plugins-vo-ca-ap package
'/software/packages/{lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap}' = nlist();
2. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/ce/service.tpl add the ca-policy-egi-cam package next to the general CA.tpl
# manually adding the cam policy for the IOTA CA's instead of in the general CA since all nodes shouldn't be using the IOTA CAs include { 'common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam' };
3. In /project/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/common/security/ create a new template file called ca-policy-egi-cam package
template common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam; "/software/packages/{ca-policy-egi-cam}" = nlist();
4. In /srv/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/wn-torque4/service.tpl the worker nodes need to load the egi-cam package. (Note! The /srv/quattor/conf/cfg/grid/umd-4/glite/wn/ will not push any packages to the worker nodes. It is no longer an active directory.) So these lines were added to the service.tpl:
# manually adding the cam policy for the IOTA CA's instead of in the general CA since all nodes should not be using the IOTA CAs include { 'common/security/ca-policy-egi-cam' };
If needed, add the VOs to the CREAM CE node ITB profile under clusters/itb/profiles/ in Quattor.
For production servers, /site/vo/cream-selected.tpl manages the list of allowed VOs.
Creating new variables
Since LCMAPS is managed by YAIM (which runs independent of the Quattor deployment), the variable VO_CA_AP_FILE needs to be defined in a few places. (The changes to these files build the site-info.pre).
VO_CA_AP_FILE="/etc/grid-security/vo-ca-ap-file"
This definition is added to:
- /quattor/conf/cfg/grid/yaim/mapping_functions.tpl (to map the variable from Quattor to YAIM)
- /quattor/conf/cfg/sites/ndpf/site/config/yaim.tpl (template that YAIM takes as input for the site-info.pre file which is used to create the lcmaps.db on the CREAM CE server.)
Creating vo-ca-ap-file
The vo-ca-ap-file template in quattor was created under grid/common/security to create a single spot for the security and policy implementations. More detailed information about the LCMAPS plugin and creating this file can be found on the LCMAPS Plugin (vo-ca-ap) wiki page.
unique template common/security/vo-ca-ap-file; include { 'components/filecopy/config' }; variable VO_CA_AP_FILE ?='/etc/grid-security/vo-ca-ap-file'; variable VO_CA_AP_CONTENT =<<EOF; # EGI Combined Adequacy Assurance Model (CAM) reference configuration # for LCMAPS-plugins-vo-ca-ap. For instructions, see # https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap # Reference configuation follows https://documents.egi.eu/document/2930 # and associated implementation guidance as for the EGI SPG processes # # EGI egi-cam version 1.95 # /atlas file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info /cms file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info /lhcb file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info /alice file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info #/lsgrid/Project_MinE file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info #subgroups are not supported at the moment so lsgrid was added /lsgrid file:policy-egi-core.info, file:policy-egi-cam.info # Default policy for other VOs: /* file:policy-egi-core.info # # for non-VOMS enabled credentials, supports only core policy trust anchors: "-" file:policy-egi-core.info EOF "/software/components/filecopy/services" = npush( escape(VO_CA_AP_FILE), nlist("config",VO_CA_AP_CONTENT, "perms","0644", "owner","root"), );
Rebuilding Nikhef RPMs
The variable(s) (VO_CA_AP_FILE) needs to be defined/updated in the nikhef-yaim-cream-ce and nikhef-yaim-core rpms.
These rpms are built locally from an svn repository (svn+ssh://svn@ndpfsvn.nikhef.nl/repos/ndpf/nl.nikhef.ndpf.yaim/trunk). The two RPMs need an additional function (config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4 and config_cream_glexec) and variable (vo_ca_ap).
- in trunk/nikhef-yaim-core/functions/local/config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4 (this file creates the lcmaps.db file on the server which now includes the vo-ca-ap policy)
vo_ca_ap = "lcmaps_vo_ca_ap.mod" " -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" " -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" # policies withvoms: vo_ca_ap -> vomslocalgroup vomslocalgroup -> vomslocalaccount vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf standard: vo_ca_ap -> localaccount localaccount -> posix_enf | poolaccount poolaccount -> posix_enf
- and again in trunk/nikhef-yaim-cream-ce/functions/local/config_cream_glexec
vo_ca_ap = "lcmaps_vo_ca_ap.mod" " -certdir ${X509_CERT_DIR}" " -vo_ca_ap_file ${VO_CA_AP_FILE}" # policies withvoms: proxycheck -> vo_ca_ap vo_ca_ap -> vomslocalgroup vomslocalgroup -> vomslocalaccount vomslocalaccount -> posix_enf | vomspoolaccount vomspoolaccount -> posix_enf standard: proxycheck -> vo_ca_ap vo_ca_ap -> localaccount localaccount -> posix_enf | poolaccount poolaccount -> posix_enf
If the files (or functions) do not exist to amend in the existing RPMs, they are available from the EGI repository: http://repository.egi.eu/sw/production/umd/4/centos7/x86_64/updates/--then search for the latest yaim-core release.
Next, the RPMs are built using the makefile available in the svn repository. The standard directory structure for building an RPM may need to be created: BUILD, BUILDROOT, RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS, and SRPMS directories.
The new noarchs are then copied to stal.nikhef.nl under /project/quattor/www/html/mirror/nikhef/tools/el6/... Finally, there needs to be a new snapshot in the Quattor profile:
makesnapshot nikhef-tools-el6 YEARMONTHDAY deploy-to-mirrors
(The deploy-to-mirrors command will push the updated snapshot to stalkaars-01 and stalkaars-03.)
The nikhef-tools snapshot is edited on stal: /srv/quattor/etc/repository-snapshots/nikhef-tools-el6.conf and conf/cfg/clusters/itb/repository/config.tpl
For the prd implementation, /project/quattor/conf/cfg/sites/ndpf/site/repository/default-snapshots.tpl updates with the snapshot date.
Pushing the changes
Check if the configuration builds with
makexprof -f itb
Debug any mistakes, then push the configuration to the testbed nodes.
pushxprof -f itb
Once this is done, it is required to rerun yaim manually on each CREAM CE server. The software packages that are pushed from quattor are triggered on the updated servers, however, the CREAM CE servers do not know that YAIM needs to be run to update the configuration. Therefore running:
ncm-ncd --co yaim
should allow the updated policies to be implemented.
Log in on a worker node to check if the software packages were added will help later in the debugging process.
Checking if it worked...
Before pushing the changes into production (prd), it is advised to push the changes to the testbed (itb) and run a simple test job with the help of a user.
Log onto a test CREAM CE server (i.e., tbn15.nikhef.nl):
- check the lcmaps-plugin has been installed
yum search lcmaps-plugins-vo-ca-ap
- /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps.db and /etc/lcmaps/lcmaps-glexec.db have the vo-ca-ap policies updated in the files.
- and/or check the config files are correct under /opt/glite/yaim/functions/config_cream_glexec and config_lcas_lcmaps_gt4.
- and this file exists: /etc/grid-security/vo-ca-ap-file
- check /usr/share/doc/ca-policy-egi/ca-policy-egi-cam.vo-ca-ap
Troubleshooting hints
- ncm-ncd --co yaim will rerun YAIM manually on the server.
- /opt/glite/yaim/bin/yaim -c -s /etc/siteinfo/lcg-quattor-site-info.def -n creamCE -n TORQUE_utils
- useful logs to check the quattor deployment: /var/log/ncm/ncd.log (more verbose information is available from /var/log/ncm-cdispd.log)
If things are still failing, it is helpful to add a VO that you can test from in the VO-CA-AP file on a CREAM CE and/or UI server, then figure out which worker node the job is being delegated to.
This was the error the user received:
****** JobID=https://stremsel.nikhef.nl:8443/CREAM910312615 Status = [DONE-FAILED] ExitCode = [N/A] FailureReason = [Cannot move ISB (retry_copy ${globus_transfer_cmd} gsiftp://stremsel.nikhef.nl/var/cream_sandbox /mine/CN_USERNAME_HBIW9YENQ_9vUbLu_O_surfsara_nl_DC_rcauth_clients_DC_rcauth_DC_eu_VONAME_NULL_Capability_NULL_mine000 /91/CREAM910312615/ISB/test.sh file:///tmp/jobdir/42164683.korf.nikhef.nl/CREAM910312615/test.sh): error: globus_ftp_client: the server responded with an error500 500-Command failed. : callback failed.500-an end-of-file was reached500-globus_xio: The GSI XIO driver failed to establish a secure connection. The failure occured during a handshake read.500-globus_xio: An end of file occurred500 End.; reason=1; Cannot move ISB (retry_copy ${globus_transfer_cmd} gsiftp://stremsel.nikhef.nl/var/cream_sandbox /mine/CN_USERNAME_HBIW9YENQ_9vUbLu_O_surfsara_nl_DC_rcauth_clients_DC_rcauth_DC_eu_VONAME_NULL_Capability_NULL_mine000 /91/CREAM910312615/ISB/test.sh file:///tmp/jobdir/42164683.korf.nikhef.nl/CREAM910312615/test.sh): error: globus_ftp_client: the server responded with an error 500 500-Command failed. : callback failed. 500-an end-of-file was reached 500-globus_xio: The GSI XIO driver failed to establish a secure connection. The failure occured during a handshake read. 500-globus_xio: An end of file occurred 500 End.]
The cause for this error seemed to be the worker nodes not having the egi-cam packages installed.
It may require adding ca_RCauth-Pilot-ICA-G1.noarch temporarily to a UI server where you can submit the jobs.
Useful references
- IGTF documentation on Combined Assurance
- LCMAPS Plugin (vo-ca-ap)
- Other notes from David G:
The quickest fix is to (first) allow the DOGWOOD CA bundle and configure the LCMAPS plugin accordingly. ...Such full support also required new software and configuration at each resource centre. You must deploy the additional trust anchor meta-packages and the new local policies in unison, and never install the cam package without such software support.