Difference between revisions of "Aod ntuple"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| </ol> | </ol> | ||
| + | '''1.''' | ||
| The <code>isEM</code> flag uses both calorimeter and tracking information in addition to TRT | The <code>isEM</code> flag uses both calorimeter and tracking information in addition to TRT | ||
| information. The flag is a bit field which marks whether the candidate passed or not some safety checks. | information. The flag is a bit field which marks whether the candidate passed or not some safety checks. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
| The bit field marks the following checks: | The bit field marks the following checks: | ||
| <code> | <code> | ||
| − | + |    Cluster based egamma | |
|     ClusterEtaRange        =  0, |     ClusterEtaRange        =  0, | ||
|     ClusterHadronicLeakage =  1, |     ClusterHadronicLeakage =  1, | ||
|     ClusterMiddleSampling  =  2, |     ClusterMiddleSampling  =  2, | ||
|     ClusterFirstSampling   =  3, |     ClusterFirstSampling   =  3, | ||
| − | + |    Track based egamma | |
|     TrackEtaRange          =  8, |     TrackEtaRange          =  8, | ||
|     TrackHitsA0            =  9, |     TrackHitsA0            =  9, | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
| </code> | </code> | ||
| − | + | In 9.0.4 there is a problem with TRT simulation so one has to mask TRT bit to recover the lost efficiency.   | |
| − | mask TRT bit to recover the lost efficiency.  | + | |
| − | + | To get the flag in your AOD analysis you should use: | |
| <code> | <code> | ||
| (*elec)->isEM() | (*elec)->isEM() | ||
| </code> | </code> | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | To mask the TRT bits you should use: <code>(*elec)->isEM()&0x7FF==0</code> | |
| − | |||
| + | If you use <code>isEM</code> then you will select electrons with an overall efficiency of about | ||
| + | 80% in the barrel but much lower in the crack and endcap. | ||
| − | + | '''2.''' | |
| + | The likelihood ratio is constructed using the following variables: energy in different calorimeter samplings, shower shapes in both eta and phi and E/P ration. No TRT information is used here. | ||
| + | You need to access two variables called <code>emweight</code> and <code>pionweight</code> then you can construct the likelihood ratio, defined by: <code>emweight/(emweight+pionweight)</code>. Emweight is the product of pdf's | ||
| − | + | In AOD, you use the following code: | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | use the following code: | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| ElecEMWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::emWeight); | ElecEMWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::emWeight); | ||
| ElecPiWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::pionWeight); | ElecPiWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::pionWeight); | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| Then form the variable: | Then form the variable: | ||
| − | X = ElecEMWeight/(ElecEMWeight+ElecPiWeight) | + | <code> | 
| + | X = ElecEMWeight/(ElecEMWeight+ElecPiWeight); | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| − | Requiring X > 0.6 will give you more than 90%  | + | Requiring X > 0.6 will give you more than 90% efficiency for electrons. | 
| − | + | '''3.''' | |
| − | likelihood. To use it in AOD you should proceed as follow: | + | The NeuralNet variable uses as inputs the same variables used for likelihood. To use it in AOD you should proceed as follow: | 
| + | <code> | ||
| ElecepiNN = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::epiNN); | ElecepiNN = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::epiNN); | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| Requiring ElecepiNN > 0.6 will give you about 90% eff for electrons.   | Requiring ElecepiNN > 0.6 will give you about 90% eff for electrons.   | ||
| − | However, you should be aware that the  | + | However, you should be aware that the NN was trained in full eta range while the likelihood was computed in 3 bins in eta: barrel, crack and endcap. So I would suggest to use likelihood for now. | 
| − | while the likelihood was computed in 3 bins in eta: barrel, crack and | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| == Muon == | == Muon == | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 19 May 2005
This page contains basic prescriptions to get physics objects from the AOD and the AOD-based Root ntuple.
Some comments on quality selection cuts will be added as work progresses.
Electron
There are 3 types of quality cuts you can perform on the electron candidates:
- Cuts based on the isEMflag
- Cuts based on likelihood
- Cuts based on NeuralNet output
1.
The isEM flag uses both calorimeter and tracking information in addition to TRT
information. The flag is a bit field which marks whether the candidate passed or not some safety checks.
The bit field marks the following checks:
  Cluster based egamma
  ClusterEtaRange        =  0,
  ClusterHadronicLeakage =  1,
  ClusterMiddleSampling  =  2,
  ClusterFirstSampling   =  3,
  Track based egamma
  TrackEtaRange          =  8,
  TrackHitsA0            =  9,
  TrackMatchAndEoP       = 10,
  TrackTRT               = 11
In 9.0.4 there is a problem with TRT simulation so one has to mask TRT bit to recover the lost efficiency.
To get the flag in your AOD analysis you should use:
(*elec)->isEM()
To mask the TRT bits you should use: (*elec)->isEM()&0x7FF==0
If you use isEM then you will select electrons with an overall efficiency of about
80% in the barrel but much lower in the crack and endcap.
2.
The likelihood ratio is constructed using the following variables: energy in different calorimeter samplings, shower shapes in both eta and phi and E/P ration. No TRT information is used here.
You need to access two variables called emweight and pionweight then you can construct the likelihood ratio, defined by: emweight/(emweight+pionweight). Emweight is the product of pdf's
In AOD, you use the following code:
ElecEMWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::emWeight);
ElecPiWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::pionWeight);
Then form the variable:
X = ElecEMWeight/(ElecEMWeight+ElecPiWeight);
Requiring X > 0.6 will give you more than 90% efficiency for electrons.
3.
The NeuralNet variable uses as inputs the same variables used for likelihood. To use it in AOD you should proceed as follow:
ElecepiNN = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::epiNN);
Requiring ElecepiNN > 0.6 will give you about 90% eff for electrons.
However, you should be aware that the NN was trained in full eta range while the likelihood was computed in 3 bins in eta: barrel, crack and endcap. So I would suggest to use likelihood for now.