Difference between revisions of "Aod ntuple"
m |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Electron == | == Electron == | ||
| − | {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" |
|+ ''' Electron in AOD/Woutuple ''' | |+ ''' Electron in AOD/Woutuple ''' | ||
| AOD Container Name | | AOD Container Name | ||
| Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
== Muon == | == Muon == | ||
| − | {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" |
|+ ''' Muon in AOD/Woutuple ''' | |+ ''' Muon in AOD/Woutuple ''' | ||
| AOD Container Name | | AOD Container Name | ||
| Line 426: | Line 426: | ||
A trick used in CDF is to neglect jets which are close to an Electron (typically dR<0.7). The same trick should be applied for Photons and Taus. | A trick used in CDF is to neglect jets which are close to an Electron (typically dR<0.7). The same trick should be applied for Photons and Taus. | ||
| − | {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" |
|+ ''' Jet in AOD/Woutuple ''' | |+ ''' Jet in AOD/Woutuple ''' | ||
| AOD Container Name | | AOD Container Name | ||
| Line 652: | Line 652: | ||
There are seven(!) Missing Et objects available in AOD: | There are seven(!) Missing Et objects available in AOD: | ||
| − | {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 3px solid orange" |
|+ '''Missing Et objects available in AOD''' | |+ '''Missing Et objects available in AOD''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Type || AOD Container Name || Include File | | Type || AOD Container Name || Include File | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |Missing Et || MET_Base | + | |Missing Et || MET_Base |
| + | |[http://reserve02.usatlas.bnl.gov/lxr/source/atlas/Reconstruction/MissingETEvent/MissingETEvent/MissingET.h MissingEtCalo.h] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Missing Et calibrated || MET_Calib || MissingEtCalo.h | |Missing Et calibrated || MET_Calib || MissingEtCalo.h | ||
Revision as of 16:54, 19 May 2005
This page contains basic prescriptions to get physics objects from the AOD and the AOD-based Root ntuple (from now on defined as Woutuple).
Some comments on quality selection cuts will be added as work progresses.
--Barison 18:12, 19 May 2005 (MET DST)
Electron
| AOD Container Name | AOD Variable | Woutuple Variable | Variable Type | Comment |
| ElectronCollection | (*elecTES)->size()
|
n_elec | Int | Number of electrons in the Woutuple |
(*elecItr)->hlv().x()
|
px_elec | Double | Px | |
(*elecItr)->hlv().y()
|
py_elec | Double | Py | |
(*elecItr)->hlv().z()
|
pz_elec | Double | Pz | |
(*elecItr)->hlv().perp()
|
pt_elec | Double | Pt | |
(*elecItr)->hlv().eta()
|
eta_elec | Double | Eta | |
(*elecItr)->hlv().phi()
|
phi_elec | Double | Phi | |
(*elecItr)->isEM()
|
isem_elec | Int | isEM flag (see below)
| |
(*elecItr)->hasTrack()
|
hastrk_elec | Int (bool) | HasTrack flag: presence of charged track in the Inner Detector
| |
(*elecItr)->z0wrtPrimVtx()
|
z0vtx_elec | Double | Intersection (z) of track with the beam axis | |
(*elecItr)->d0wrtPrimVtx()
|
d0vtx_elec | Double | Transverse impact parameter d0 | |
(*elecItr)->numberOfBLayerHits()
|
nblayerhits_elec | Int | Number of hits in the Pixel B-layer | |
(*elecItr)->numberOfPixelHits()
|
npixelhits_elec | Int | Number of hits in the Pixel detector | |
(*elecItr)->numberOfSCTHits()
|
nscthits_elec | Int | Number of hits in the SCT | |
(*elecItr)->numberOfTRTHits()
|
ntrthits_elec | Int | Number of hits in the TRT | |
(*elecItr)->numberOfTRTHighThresholdHits()
|
ntrththits_elec | Int | Number of high threshold hits in the TRT | |
(*elecItr)->author()
|
auth_elec | Int (enum) | Algorithm used to create the electron: unknown=0, egamma=1, softe=2
| |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::EoverP)
|
eoverp_elec | Double | E/P ratio | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::etcone)
|
etcone_elec | Double | Energy deposition in a cone dR=0.45 around the electron cluster | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::etcone20)
|
etcone20_elec | Double | Energy deposition in a cone dR=0.20 around the electron cluster. Standard cone size for ATLFAST | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::etcone30)
|
etcone30_elec | Double | Energy deposition in a cone dR=0.30 around the electron cluster. Currently empty | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::etcone40)
|
etcone40_elec | Double | Energy deposition in a cone dR=0.40 around the electron cluster | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::emWeight)
|
emwgt_elec | Double | Weight for electrons (see below) | |
(*elecItr)->parameter(ElectronParameters::pionWeight)
|
piwgt_elec | Double | Weight for pions (see below) |
There are 3 types of quality cuts you can perform on the electron candidates:
- Cuts based on the
isEMflag - Cuts based on likelihood
- Cuts based on NeuralNet output
1.
The isEM flag uses both calorimeter and tracking information in addition to TRT
information. The flag is a bit field which marks whether the candidate passed or not some safety checks.
The bit field marks the following checks:
Cluster based egamma
ClusterEtaRange = 0,
ClusterHadronicLeakage = 1,
ClusterMiddleSampling = 2,
ClusterFirstSampling = 3,
Track based egamma
TrackEtaRange = 8,
TrackHitsA0 = 9,
TrackMatchAndEoP = 10,
TrackTRT = 11
In 9.0.4 there is a problem with TRT simulation so one has to mask TRT bit to recover the lost efficiency.
To get the flag in your AOD analysis you should use:
(*elec)->isEM()
To mask the TRT bits you should use: (*elec)->isEM()&0x7FF==0
If you use isEM then you will select electrons with an overall efficiency of about
80% in the barrel but much lower in the crack and endcap.
2.
The likelihood ratio is constructed using the following variables: energy in different calorimeter samplings, shower shapes in both eta and phi and E/P ration. No TRT information is used here.
You need to access two variables called emweight and pionweight then you can construct the likelihood ratio, defined by: emweight/(emweight+pionweight).
In AOD, you use the following code:
ElecEMWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::emWeight);
ElecPiWeight = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::pionWeight);
Then form the variable:
X = ElecEMWeight/(ElecEMWeight+ElecPiWeight);
Requiring X > 0.6 will give you more than 90% efficiency for electrons.
3.
The NeuralNet variable uses as inputs the same variables used for likelihood. To use it in AOD you should proceed as follow:
ElecepiNN = elec*->parameter(ElectronParameters::epiNN);
Requiring ElecepiNN > 0.6 will give you about 90% eff for electrons.
However, you should be aware that the NN was trained in full eta range while the likelihood was computed in 3 bins in eta: barrel, crack and endcap. So I would suggest to use likelihood for now.
To require an isolated electron, you have to cut on the energy deposited in the cone around the electron cluster. ATLFAST for example requires Et<10 GeV in a cone of dR=0.2. You can simulate the ATLFAST cut by requiring etcone20<10.*GeV
Photon
Muon
| AOD Container Name | AOD Variable | Woutuple Variable | Variable Type | Comment |
| MuonCollection | (*muonTES)->size()
|
n_muon | Int | Number of muons in the Woutuple |
(*muonItr)->hlv().x()
|
px_muon | Double | Px | |
(*muonItr)->hlv().y()
|
py_muon | Double | Py | |
(*muonItr)->hlv().z()
|
pz_muon | Double | Pz | |
(*muonItr)->hlv().perp()
|
pt_muon | Double | Pt | |
(*muonItr)->hlv().eta()
|
eta_muon | Double | Eta | |
(*muonItr)->hlv().phi()
|
phi_muon | Double | Phi | |
(*muonItr)->author()
|
auth_muon | Int (enum) | Algorithm used to create the muon: unknown=0, highPt=1, lowPt=2
| |
(*muonItr)->chi2()
|
chi2_muon | Double | Chi2 of the track fit. Empty for now (see below) | |
(*muonItr)->getConeIsol()[0]
|
coneiso0_muon | Double | ||
(*muonItr)->getEtIsol()[0]
|
etiso0_muon | Double | ||
(*muonItr)->hasCombinedMuon()
|
hascombi_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->hasInDetTrackParticle()
|
hasindettp_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->hasMuonSpectrometerTrackParticle()
|
hasmuspectp_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->hasMuonExtrapolatedTrackParticle()
|
hasmmuextrtp_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->hasCombinedMuonTrackParticle()
|
hascombimutp_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->hasCluster()
|
hasclus_muon | Int (bool) | ||
(*muonItr)->isHighPt()
|
ishipt_muon | Int (bool) | Is the muon produced with the highPt algorithm? (see also author())
| |
(*muonItr)->isLowPt()
|
islopt_muon | Int (bool) | Is the muon produced with the lowPt algorithm? (see also author())
| |
(*muonItr)->numberOfBLayerHits()
|
nblayerhits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfPixelHits(
|
npixelhits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfSCTHits()
|
nscthits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfTRTHits()
|
ntrthits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfMDTHits()
|
nmdthits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfCSCEtaHits()
|
ncscetahits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfCSCPhiHits()
|
ncscphihits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfRPCEtaHits()
|
nrpcetahits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfRPCPhiHits(
|
nrpcphihits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfTGCEtaHits()
|
ntgcetahits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->numberOfTGCPhiHits()
|
ntgcphihits_muon | Int | ||
(*muonItr)->z0wrtPrimVtx()
|
z0vtx_muon | Double | ||
(*muonItr)->d0wrtPrimVtx()
|
d0vtx_muon | Double |
temporary: The muons have highPt and lowPt algorithms. The overlap is removed, but you may want to only use the highPt ones. The chi2() method is always 0 in 10.0.1, so you will have to access the CombinedMuon through something like
const Rec::TrackParticle* cbndMuon = part->get_CombinedMuonTrackParticle();
if( cbndMuon ) {
double chi2 = cbndMuon->fitQuality()->chiSquared();
int ndof = cbndMuon->fitQuality()->numberDoF();
if( ndof > 0 ) chi2 = chi2/ndof;
return chi2;
}
Tau
Jet
There are three collections of jets:
- KtTowerParticleJets (Kt algorithm with parameter D=1)
- Cone4TowerParticleJets (Cone algorithm with R=0.4)
- ConeTowerParticleJets (Cone algorithm with R=0.7)
Unfortunately, the Woutuple contains only one collection for the time being. The collection can be selected when you produce the Woutuple, by modifying the jobOptions file.
All three alogrithms have a common data structure.
You can get the energy contributions to a jet from different calorimeter samplings.
Each calorimeter (Barrel and Endcap) has up to 4 samplings:
PreSamplerB, EMB1, EMB2, EMB3, // LAr barrel
PreSamplerE, EME1, EME2, EME3, // LAr EM endcap
HEC0, HEC1, HEC2, HEC3, // Hadronic end cap cal.
TileBar0, TileBar1, TileBar2, // Tile barrel
TileGap1, TileGap2, TileGap3, // Tile gap (ITC & scint)
TileExt0, TileExt1, TileExt2, // Tile extended barrel
FCAL0, FCAL1, FCAL2, // Forward EM endcap
Overlapping jets and fake jets: A trick used in CDF is to neglect jets which are close to an Electron (typically dR<0.7). The same trick should be applied for Photons and Taus.
| AOD Container Name | AOD Variable | Woutuple Variable | Variable Type | Comment |
| KtTowerParticleJets Cone4TowerParticleJets ConeTowerParticleJets | (*jetTES)->size()
|
n_jet | Int | Number of jets in the Woutuple |
(*jetItr)->hlv().x()
|
px_jet | Double | Px | |
(*jetItr)->hlv().y()
|
py_jet | Double | Py | |
(*jetItr)->hlv().z()
|
pz_jet | Double | Pz | |
(*jetItr)->hlv().perp()
|
pt_jet | Double | Pt | |
(*jetItr)->hlv().eta()
|
eta_jet | Double | Eta | |
(*jetItr)->hlv().phi()
|
phi_jet | Double | Phi | |
(*jetItr)->pCalo().x()
|
px_calo_jet | Double | ||
(*jetItr)->pCalo().y()
|
py_calo_jet | Double | ||
(*jetItr)->pCalo().z()
|
pz_calo_jet | Double | ||
(*jetItr)->etEM(0)
|
etem0_jet | Double | Et from EM_Calo Sample_1(B+E) and Presampler (B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->etEM(1)
|
etem1_jet | Double | Et from EM_Calo Sample_2(B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->etEM(2)
|
etem2_jet | Double | Et from EM_Calo Sample_3(B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->etHad(0)
|
ethad0_jet | Double | Et from HAD_Calo Sample_0(B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->etHad(1)
|
ethad1_jet | Double | Et from HAD_Calo Sample_1(B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->etHad(2)
|
ethad2_jet | Double | Et from HAD_Calo Sample_2(B+E) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::PreSamplerB)
|
epresb_jet | Double | Energy in PreSampler (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EMB1)
|
eemb1_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_1 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EMB2)
|
eemb2_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_2 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EMB3)
|
eemb3_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_3 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::PreSamplerE)
|
eprese_jet | Double | Energy in PreSampler (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EME1)
|
eeme1_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_1 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EME2)
|
eeme2_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_2 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::EME3)
|
eeme3_jet | Double | Energy in EM_Calo Sample_3 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::HEC0)
|
ehec0_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_0 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::HEC1)
|
ehec1_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_1 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::HEC2)
|
ehec2_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_2 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::HEC3)
|
ehec3_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_3 (Endcap) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileBar0)
|
etilebar0_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_0 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileBar1)
|
etilebar1_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_1 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileBar2)
|
etilebar2_jet | Double | Energy in HAD_Calo Sample_2 (Barrel) | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileGap1)
|
etilegap1_jet | Double | Energy in Tile_gap Sample_1 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileGap2)
|
etilegap2_jet | Double | Energy in Tile_gap Sample_2 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileGap3)
|
etilegap3_jet | Double | Energy in Tile_gap Sample_3 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileExt0)
|
etileext0_jet | Double | Energy in Tile Extended Barrel Sample_0 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileExt1)
|
etileext1_jet | Double | Energy in Tile Extended Barrel Sample_1 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::TileExt2)
|
etileext2_jet | Double | Energy in Tile Extended Barrel Sample_2 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::FCAL0)
|
efcal0_jet | Double | Energy in FCAL Sample_0 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::FCAL1)
|
efcal1_jet | Double | Energy in FCAL Sample_1 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::FCAL2)
|
efcal2_jet | Double | Energy in FCAL Sample_2 | |
(*jetItr)->energyInSample(CaloSampling::Unknown)
|
eunknown_jet | Double | WTF??? | |
(*jetItr)->energyInCryostat() ;
|
ecryo_jet | Double | Energy lost in the cryostat — empiric evaluation sqrt(EMB3 * TileBar0) |
BJet
Missing Et
There are seven(!) Missing Et objects available in AOD:
| Type | AOD Container Name | Include File |
| Missing Et | MET_Base | MissingEtCalo.h |
| Missing Et calibrated | MET_Calib | MissingEtCalo.h |
| Missing Et Truth | MET_Truth | MissingEtTruth.h |
| Missing Et Muon | MET_Muon | MissingET.h |
| Missing Et Final | MET_Final | MissingET.h |
| Missing Et Cryostat correction | MET_Cryo | MissingET.h |
| Missing Et Topological Clusters | MET_Topo | MissingET.h |