Difference between revisions of "Dark count measurements"
m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:DCrate VUV1821.png|left|thumb|A histogram of all combined 30000 waveforms, where the rate for each waveform is calculated separately and based on the single pe pulses.]] | [[File:DCrate VUV1821.png|left|thumb|A histogram of all combined 30000 waveforms, where the rate for each waveform is calculated separately and based on the single pe pulses.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 18 November 2022
We want to characterize the dark count rates of each of our individual SiPMs.
VUV SiPM 1821
On 17-11-2022 we recorded with a room temperature of 17 degrees Celcius. We took 20 times a set of 1000 waveforms and 1 set of 10,000 waveforms at a pressure of 7.4x10^-5 mbar. We also took two noise runs where after starting the run normally, the SiPM bias was turned off. We select single photo-electron peaks with a simple threshold argument, and compute the rate of all combined dark count data. This gives us a dark count rate of 1.4+-0.3 MHz.
VIS SiPM 01
On 18-11-2022 we recorded with a room temperature of 18 degrees Celsius. We took 20 times a set of 1000 waveforms and 1 set of 10,000 waveforms at a pressure of 6.3x10^-5 mbar. We also took two noise runs and one run with the lamp turned on at 400nm and slightly opened slits. Note that the SiPM was in fact behind the sample holder and not directly exposed to any light from the lamp. We select single photo-electron peaks with a simple threshold argument, and compute the rate of all combined dark count data. This gives us a dark count rate of 3.0+-0.4 MHz.