Difference between revisions of "How to handle OpenSSL and not get hurt"

From PDP/Grid Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
This section will have all kinds of background information regarding OpenSSL, Proxy certificates, CAs, formatting details and other (hopefully) useful tidbits.
 
This section will have all kinds of background information regarding OpenSSL, Proxy certificates, CAs, formatting details and other (hopefully) useful tidbits.
 
[[How to handle OpenSSL and not get hurt background information]]
 
[[How to handle OpenSSL and not get hurt background information]]
 
=== OpenSSL oneline format ===
 
 
OpenSSL uses a more readable format then RFC2253 (aka X500Name). The format is a defacto for wide variety of tools, services and infrastructures. To the best of my knowledge it was Globus which adopted the format for the '''grid-mapfile'''. This file authorizes users based on their certificate's subject DN and specifies a one-to-one mapping between a subject DN and a local Unix system account. In the time IBM has adopted it for their Grid middleware as many others have followed in the footsteps of Globus.
 
 
To see the OpenSSL oneline format at work, you'll have to dive into the command line and try it to see both the Subject DN and the Issuer DN:
 
 
Vision:~ okoeroo$ openssl x509 -noout -in usercert.pem -subject
 
subject= /O=dutchgrid/O=users/O=nikhef/CN=Oscar Koeroo
 
issuer= /C=NL/O=NIKHEF/CN=NIKHEF medium-security certification auth
 
 
 
The output shows DN for both the issuer and the subject. In the oneline format the Relative Distinguished Name (RDN). RDNs are separated by slash-signs. Although a DN MUST be read as is, in the oneline-format the left-most RDN is the most significant RDN when taking the build-up of its sub-components into account. This differs per printable string format.
 
 
Each RDN is a attribute and multi-valued pair. The attribute name is a registered OID. Usually only one value is associated to each attribute. The value is a UTF8String in the ASN.1 sequence, though commonly only ASCII characters are used because a lot of middleware is unable to handle UTF8 characters. The oneline notation describes the binding between an OID and a value with a equal-sign. The separator between multiple values is the plus-sign.
 
 
 
Less information can be found here: http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/x509.html#item_oneline
 
 
=== The Distinguished Name in detail ===
 
 
The DN is a sequence of Relative Distinguished Names (RDNs), described in RFC2253 (though superseeded by another one that I need to lookup). The [http://www.igtf.net/ International Grid Trust Federation (IGTF)], its PMAs ([http://www.eugridpma.org/ European Policy Management Authority (EUGridPMA)], [http://www.apgridpma.org/ Asia Pacific Grid Policy Management Authority (APGridPMA)] and [http://www.tagpma.org/ The Americas Grid Policy Management Authority] (TAGPMA)) and [http://www.tacar.org/ TERENA Academic CA Repository (TACAR)] have scoped the usage of the available RDNs in CA due to the fact that different printable string representations of the same RDN Object Identifiers (OID) have been used or that the same printable string has been associated to different registered OIDs. Which makes the practical usage between inter-operating middleware which can be based in Java, C, Python, Perl, OpenSSL, Bouncycastle, GnuTLS and homebrew solutions impossible.
 
 
The DN is build up based upon the openssl.cnf file used by the CA during the signing process. Each CA SHOULD use a private namespace and declare the namespace publicly. CAs, like those in the [http://www.igtf.net/ International Grid Trust Federation (IGTF)], will not overlap in their namespaces. Commercial CAs tend to have a declared name space of '''.*''', hence they do not limit their signing namespace by any shape or form. This makes certificates from commercial CAs inherently non-unique and therefore not very usable in a global Grid environment without additional policies in place.
 
 
=== The general 'how do (proxy) certificates work' and 'what is a proxy certificate' ===
 
 
When (identity) delegation are used in a world full of X.509 certificates it means that you are using proxy certificates. Proxy certificates come in various shapes, forms and types. Some of the basics properties are consistent:
 
 
* It's an X.509 certificate
 
* Has a public and private key pair.
 
* The first delegated proxy certificate is signed by an End-Entity Certificate (EEC). An EEC means your personal certificate.
 
* Proxy certificates can signed and follow other proxy certificates
 
 
A certificate chain with one delegation, will be constructed like this:
 
# CA certificate
 
# EEC (personal, server or service certificate)
 
# proxy certificate
 
 
 
In short, the construction steps (certificate "Genesis") to a proxy certificate:
 
* The CA operator creates a key pair and a signing request for the root CA certificate
 
* The CA operator (self-)signs its own request with its own private key
 
* A user creates a key pair, a signing request and send that off to a CA operator
 
* The CA operator performs identity vetting on the user and its signing request
 
* The CA operator creates the certificate from the signing request, signs it with the CA's private key and returns a brand new certificate to the user
 
* The user can use {grid,voms}-proxy-init to generate a new keypair, signing request for the proxy certificate and sign the proxy certificate with his/her private key.
 
 
Adding another proxy certificate layer is a repeat of the final step, but instead of using the user's certificate and private key, the certificate and private key of the latest created proxy certificate are used to create the next delegation and sign that proxy certificate.
 
 
 
A more complex certificate chain:
 
# CA certificate
 
# intermediate or sub-CA certificate
 
# yet another intermediate or sub-CA certificate
 
# EEC (personal, server or service certificate)
 
# proxy certificate
 
# another proxy certificate
 
  
 
== What does that library call really do? ==
 
== What does that library call really do? ==

Revision as of 21:41, 7 July 2011

Stuff you wished to know before you every needed to touch the OpenSSL library

This page is constructed as a personal braindump to be able to share some point of reference with those involved with OpenSSL. On the web OpenSSL is poorly documented and even the book Network Security with OpenSSL doesn't touch the advanced inner workings of the library. The library and its CLI tools are a part of our everyday Grid life and working with it, as intimately as developing callback functions and home-brew proxy certificate verification routines, has let me research how stuff works deeply from within the rabbit hole of the library itself.


I'd like to invite everybody who reads this to contribute tips, tricks, {code,wiki}-patches, need-to-knows, pitfalls, quirks, interesting routines, &c to this page directly or for external to Nikhef people through my email address.


You can contact me via email: okoeroo apestaartje nikhef punt nl.

Tip #1

When in true doubt: Use the source! When you're looking for anything particular or specialized and you really wish to know how OpenSSL is handling this: Use the Source!. There are more gems in the documentation of the OpenSSL source tarballs and it's easily grep-able.


Background information

This section will have all kinds of background information regarding OpenSSL, Proxy certificates, CAs, formatting details and other (hopefully) useful tidbits. How to handle OpenSSL and not get hurt background information

What does that library call really do?

X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain() vs. X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain()

There exists X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) and X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx). The difference is that the X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain() will only return a reference to the certificate chain (type STACK_OF (X509) *) from within the X509_STORE_CTX structure and the X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain() will make a duplicate certificate chain that will need to be free()'d.

Proper memory liberation of a STACK_OF (X509) *

Freeing a STACK_OF (X509) * is not to be done with just free(). That will create a memory leak. Also a X509_free (X509) * and using a STACK_OF (X509) * as input will create a memory leak. The proper way to free a STACK_OF (X509) * is to use sk_X509_pop_free(st, free_func), where for free_func you should use X509_free. Example: sk_X509_pop_free(chain, X509_free). Warning: do not get confused with sk_X509_free() which will accept the STACK_OF (<type>) *, but does not pop the stack to free all the individual certificates of the chain (which will be equal to an instant memory leakage for any certificate chain longer then one certificate).

Getting the oneline notation of a Subject DN and Issuer DN (properly)

To get the issuer DN and subject DN you can use constructions like:

char * cert_DN   = X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_subject_name (cert), NULL, 0);
char * issuer_DN = X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_issuer_name (cert), NULL, 0);

or

char cert_DN[255];
char issuer_DN[255];
X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_subject_name (cert), cert_DN, 255);
X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_issuer_name (cert), issuer_DN, 255);

In the first construction you'll need to free both the cert_DN and the issuer_DN. In the second example a static buffer is used and filled by the X509_NAME_oneline() routines.

Verification depth extensions and supporting unlimited proxy certificate delegations

OpenSSL uses a default depth of 9 (don't ask why, it just is).

To cope with Subordinate CAs we have to extend the verification depth to be able to hold the certificate chain (could contain a lot of delegations) and all the CA certificate, which might not be added to the certificate chain itself but would still be lingering in the X509 CA directory lookup functions.

After setting up a X509_STORE object, by adding the lookup functions for the CA directory, adding the verification callback function (for proper proxy support), and setting the proper flags... you can create a X509_STORE_CTX object from it with X509_STORE_CTX_new(). Then you can initialize the X509_STORE_CTX object with the certificate chain and the call to X509_STORE_CTX_init(). After setting the purpose to the proper setting and the extra flag if the OpenSSL version is higher then 0.9.8, we can finally get to the chase and upgrade the verification depth to something more usefull.

Our solution (for now) is to upgrade the depth to be the number of certificates in the chain, plus the OpenSSL default verification depth.

Use X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth() to fit the certificate chain, sub-CAs and root CA into it. We've chosen to check for the certificate chain's depth, plus the OpenSSL of 9. The X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth() is a macro in OpenSSL 0.9.7a and it's implemented as a wrapper function in OpenSSL 0.9.8a.

/* Alter verification depth to fit the certificate chain, sub-CAs and root CA */
X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth (verify_ctx, depth + VERIFICATION_CHAIN_DEPTH_EXTENSION);

Interesting OpenSSL CLI need-to-knows

Go to the OpenSSL CLI foo page: How to handle OpenSSL and not get hurt using the CLI.